Joe sent me these notes he took during today's class (a couple of the ideas sparked wildfires in his mind). Some of the terms are Raymond Williams', whose work Joe has been thinking about for several years.
_____________________________________________________________
Some notes
Emergence – reinvention?
Recycling?
Re-interpretation
What is the difference between the artistic interior motive and the outward performative action?
Is there some clue as to a re-invigoration of a form that still retains the elemental attitude?or spirit – zeit – drive – or even a motive that isn’t quite residual? Can a form be reappropriated from the dominant? what or how is this to be termed? It is not residual. Is it re-emergence? In Benjamin is it merely a copy? What if the “artist” or the group is aware and is specifically the form and turning it from an innocuous dominant form into a new radicalization of emergence? Radicalized emergence? Radicalized residual?
What again is the difference between the artistic interior motive and the outward performative aspect. Is a performer only a performer? Is motive so important. Can motive take a dominant form and defy its dominance? Can a form be reclaimed? If a form or a group re-emerges will or can there be residual dominant elements? If so what role do those dominant elements play in the re-emergence, is the re-emergence then just a novelization of residual elements? Again what of motives? Can a group or artist purposely and effectively defy the dominant – or domination of a form. What is the role of motive?
More notes
Artificial lines of flight? Escapism?
Slot machines
No negativity in the home allowed
Disruption in the line of flight?
Ahab? Simultaneously searching and performing a role at work – disrupted in the search by his work
What is the balance?
Not distracted, disrupted!
Artificial vs. actual
How does language play into these disruptions?
Building today with yesterdays tool
Symulteneity
Alphabet – loss of memory
Internet – loss of communication? Focus? Humanity? Communion? Experience?
Even more notes
Place as context
Group as context?
Group and place places
Multiplicity of context in various groups
and contexts
how do I articulate that in each group there can be multiple contexts (or locus) and each place can be a locus for multiple groups
can there be multiple locus for a group? (goner records/goner-board)
what are the hierarchies involved in this structure?
How do they hold, how do they not hold?
In groups – the typical personalities dominate
In places – availability? Historical context? Financial?
Internet based groups – participatory?
The hierarchy of personal contact Is not always king or on the power end of the binary wit? Quantity of post?
How does persona contact factor in?
Is it always necessary? How do internet message board groups function in relation to personal contact?
Goner – is the message board a locus? Is the store? Can two places be a locus for a single group?
Multiplicity of locus? (parallel authenticity?) goner is this, goner is also this.
Authentic in what sense? Authenticity seems to place an monetary or some other arbitrary value on the group
1 comments:
the specific context for the williams stuff is found in an essay entitled "dominant, emregent and residual" and is found in the text entitled "marxism and literature".
Post a Comment